Skip to main content

The human cost of Southwark's housing repairs failure

For some, it's difficult to quantify the human cost of a £700 million black hole in Southwark's budget for bringing council homes up to a decent standard. It sounds like a big number, but does it have much of an impact on real people's lives? Isn't this just a game of political claim and counter claim?

For those unfortunate enought to be living in one of Southwark's 18,000 sub-standard homes, the impact is only too real. For those individuals and families it can mean a home which is cold, damp and without even the most basic of facilities. Southwark's Labour Councillors have recently published "No Way To Live", a document which attempts to put some pressure on the Liberal Administration which refuses to tackle this crisis through cross party co-operation. Take a look at just one of the examples given in the document:

"In February 2008, a woman living with her three young children in Peckham reported to the council that her toilet ceiling leaked with grey water dripping through. The extractor fan in the toilet was also broken, which led to a serious build-up of damp and mould

The woman was concerned about the potential health risk for her children. By mid-July, five months after the initial complaint, six appointments to fix it had been made and missed by the council’s contractors. The woman had been forced to take time off work without pay to be available for some of the appointments.


In August 2008 the council’s contractors decorated the bathroom but didn’t fix the extractor fan or theleak and so the damp and the mould returned. By the following May the leak had still not been fixed and was getting worse by the day. More appointments were made and missed until in June this year the council’s contractors discovered the source of the leak was a cracked ‘soil pipe’, which carries dirty water away from the flats above.

When the decorators returned to finally fix the problem in July this year, 17 months after it was first reported, they discovered what looked like asbestos and all work had to be stopped until tests had been done"

This sobering document shows the real human cost of administrative failure in Southwark. Last month the Lib Dem/Tory Coalition agreed their new housing strategy. In doing so they completely failed to set out a coherent strategy for bringing these homes up to scratch and even hid the fact that there was a huge funding gap.

Southwark's Labour councillors first called on the administration to set up a cross-party body to deal with this issue in January 2008. They refused then and they have been refusing ever since. Bringing Southwark’s homes up to standard is a huge challenge, we wouldn’t want to suggest otherwise, but we have to work together to come up with a solution. Stories such as the one given above clearly show that the council’s decision to put its head in the sand and to try to hide from this problem is causing misery for far too many. People living in sub-standard housing in Peckham Rye ward and across the borough have a right to expect better from their landlord.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Know Your Ryes!

A few weeks ago I was in a meeting with some local residents and council officers. During the meeting one person started referring to Rye Lane, when in fact they meant Peckham Rye East. Later on another started talking about Peckham Rye Common and it took us a little while to work out that they really meant Peckham Rye Park.   You can't really blame people for getting a little confused. There are so many references to "Rye" in our little bit of South London that even the locals can get mixed up. So I thought I'd have a go at writing a little glossary of all the Ryes hereabout.  Clearly I'm making a rod for my own back here, so please point out any errors I've made in the comments box below.  Anyway, here are my definitions of the ubiquitous Ryes. Some serious, some not so serious, and in no particular order: Peckham Rye Ward - The council ward area. Peckham Rye Ward was created out of Rye Ward, Waverley Ward and Bellenden Ward following the Local

Lib Dems claim they're not in charge in Peckham Rye

(A tweet from the Peckham Rye Lib Dems) Peckham Rye Lib Dems are now claiming that Labour 'run' Peckham Rye (take a look above). When asked by a local resident "Am I right in thinking Lib Dems run Southwark but Labour run Peckham Rye?", a Peckham Rye Lib Dem candiate replied, "Yes you're right. For the next three months Lab run Peckham Rye. Then we take over..." Given that, just like every other area in Southwark, Peckham Rye is run by the Lib Dem-Tory Executive it seems this is just the latest in a string of attempts to mislead people into thinking they've got nothing to do with Southwark's failures. Of course, Peckham Rye does have three Labour councillors, who do a great job of representing our area and our concerns at the Town Hall. However this is very different from 'running' Peckham Rye. If only we could just opt out of the Lib Dem chaos! In truth, the policy levers and almost all the money spent by the council are under the cont

Another Bog Standard Update

Many local residents may well be wondering what is happening with the previously proposed development of the toilet block near the junction of Peckham Rye and East Dulwich Road. Before Renata, Victoria and I were even elected as councillors, this had become quite a lively issue. I recently asked officers at the council what is going on, because nothing appeared to be happening with the block. Well, since the last update, this is what has happened: 1. The last proposed tenant - a not-for-profit gallery offering outreach programmes to local schools and groups - dropped out of the process without having made the required planning application. 2. The property is now under offer to a new proposed tenant. They run a children's nursery and wish to expand. 3. They have already made a planning application for a change of use. 4. We are currently waiting for a formal decision from development control so that the lease can proceed. I'll update again here as soon as I have further news. Sp