Skip to main content

The Ivy House Pub: Officially a Community Asset


I know I'm a bit late posting on this, but just wanted to mark the important news about the Ivy House Pub.

Many congratulations to all the campaigners who succesfully fought to get the Pub (on Stuart Road) to be officially listed as a community asset.  Buildings listed as community assets can't be sold without first giving community groups the right to bid for them. Southwark's Labour council is the first council to list such an asset.

I also know that that Cllr Claire Hickson (Cabinet Member for Communities and Economic Development) has been working on this with local residents...so a big thanks to her too.

There is still a huge amount that needs to be done before the Pub's future is secured.  But this is a very positive step.

For those that want more detail, beneath is the text from the press release put out by the council...
-------------------------------
The Ivy House pub in Nunhead, a classic 1930s, wood-panelled building, recently listed by English Heritage may be the first venue nationally to be protected after local people rallied to nominate it for listing as a community asset by Southwark council under the Localism Act.

The pub, which was previously known as the Newlands Tavern boasts many original features such as a curved bar and timber panelled walls. It was one of the major pub music venues in South London during the ‘pub-rock’ boom of the mid-1970s. It hosted early incarnations of many bands and performers who later rose to fame including Ian Dury, Elvis Costello, Joe Strummer and Dr Feelgood. The pub was later renamed the Stuart Arms before becoming The Ivy House.

The campaigners see the Ivy House as a key asset to the local community in Nunhead. It is one of only two pubs at the eastern end of the neighbourhood and as such has played a pivotal role in community life both as a pub and popular venue used by the community for a range of purposes. The pub’s immediate vicinity is marked by an absence of places to meet and socialise in the evenings.

Its continued success as a destination music venue and performance space came to an abrupt end in April 2012 when it was closed to the public.

Since then, a group of local residents have battled to save the building and retain it as a community space, recognising its historical significance and merit as a community hub.

Under the Localism Act, local groups can nominate buildings for listing in a register of assets of community value, held by the council. Buildings that are successfully listed cannot be sold without first giving community groups the right to bid for them, in order to use them for community benefit. Southwark is the first council to list such an asset.

The pub was withdrawn from auction on 29 October 2012 by its current owner and now the property appears on the council’s list of assets of community value under the Localism Act. A community group could bid for the property when it next goes for sale to try to ensure its community use into the future.

Councillor Claire Hickson, cabinet member for communities and economic development, said: “I’m delighted at the strength of feeling and determination of local people to save this space for future generations. With a new school and housing being built next door, saving this building for community use can only be a positive addition to the area. The fact that Southwark is the first London council to register a community asset demonstrates the strength of our local communities and our commitment to supporting them. I would like to thank the local councillors for their contribution to this campaign.”

Plans for the venue by the group, should they successfully buy it, could range from using it as a music recording space, to an entertainment venue, community meeting space and studio room for artists and musicians

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Know Your Ryes!

A few weeks ago I was in a meeting with some local residents and council officers. During the meeting one person started referring to Rye Lane, when in fact they meant Peckham Rye East. Later on another started talking about Peckham Rye Common and it took us a little while to work out that they really meant Peckham Rye Park.   You can't really blame people for getting a little confused. There are so many references to "Rye" in our little bit of South London that even the locals can get mixed up. So I thought I'd have a go at writing a little glossary of all the Ryes hereabout.  Clearly I'm making a rod for my own back here, so please point out any errors I've made in the comments box below.  Anyway, here are my definitions of the ubiquitous Ryes. Some serious, some not so serious, and in no particular order: Peckham Rye Ward - The council ward area. Peckham Rye Ward was created out of Rye Ward, Waverley Ward and Bellenden Ward following the Local

Lib Dems claim they're not in charge in Peckham Rye

(A tweet from the Peckham Rye Lib Dems) Peckham Rye Lib Dems are now claiming that Labour 'run' Peckham Rye (take a look above). When asked by a local resident "Am I right in thinking Lib Dems run Southwark but Labour run Peckham Rye?", a Peckham Rye Lib Dem candiate replied, "Yes you're right. For the next three months Lab run Peckham Rye. Then we take over..." Given that, just like every other area in Southwark, Peckham Rye is run by the Lib Dem-Tory Executive it seems this is just the latest in a string of attempts to mislead people into thinking they've got nothing to do with Southwark's failures. Of course, Peckham Rye does have three Labour councillors, who do a great job of representing our area and our concerns at the Town Hall. However this is very different from 'running' Peckham Rye. If only we could just opt out of the Lib Dem chaos! In truth, the policy levers and almost all the money spent by the council are under the cont

Another Bog Standard Update

Many local residents may well be wondering what is happening with the previously proposed development of the toilet block near the junction of Peckham Rye and East Dulwich Road. Before Renata, Victoria and I were even elected as councillors, this had become quite a lively issue. I recently asked officers at the council what is going on, because nothing appeared to be happening with the block. Well, since the last update, this is what has happened: 1. The last proposed tenant - a not-for-profit gallery offering outreach programmes to local schools and groups - dropped out of the process without having made the required planning application. 2. The property is now under offer to a new proposed tenant. They run a children's nursery and wish to expand. 3. They have already made a planning application for a change of use. 4. We are currently waiting for a formal decision from development control so that the lease can proceed. I'll update again here as soon as I have further news. Sp