Skip to main content

Peckham Rye Common Toilets and a new Community Council Group

This evening, Victoria went along to the sub-group set up at the last Nunhead and Peckham Rye Community Council. This group was initially set-up to discuss how the closed public toilets on Peckham Rye Common might be put to a more appropriate use than that originally suggested by the council. Between the decision to set up the group and tonight's first meeting, things have changed significantly

To cut a long story short, the council's preferred commercial tenant pulled out and a much more attractive bidder (in local community terms) in the shape of "Peckham Rye Projects" moved to the front of the queue of potential tenants. Peckham Rye Projects are a not-for-profit gallery offering outreach programmes to local schools and groups. Their intention is to restore the building, maintain the gardens and to open the gallery toilets to the public.

It was confirmed tonight that Peckham Rye Projects (PRP) have now signed the lease on the building. However, this does not quite mean that the deal is signed, sealed and delivered. PRP are still waiting for the outcome of their bid to the local pot of "cleaner, greener safer" money and still need planning permission to be granted. We've e-mailed Anna at PRP to see if she can give us any further details on PRP latest plans.

With the the issue of the public toilets largely taking on a life of its own, the sub-group tonight widened its remit to discuss how the council consults local communities on the use of their assets. It also tried to identify key projects or developments that community groups and local residents would like to play a role in shaping. A brief summary of the actions arising from these discussions is as follows:

1. The group will formally request a list of all council owned properties in the Nunhead and Peckham Rye Area.

2. The group will also ask for a list of empty properties, both private and council owned properties, in the same area.

3. A request will be put in for the council to allocate a senior level council officer to coordinate the development and regeneration of Peckham town centre and Rye Lane. Senior officers will be invited to next the sub-group meeting to discuss upcoming projects for this area.

4. Keen that the group doesn't just talk about Rye Lane, Victoria suggested that the group also look into the development of smaller shopping parades in Peckham Rye and Nunhead. These small parades could become focal points for the communities around them and improvements could help them avoid being blighted by empty properties. The group will ask if the council can allocate an officer to the various smaller shopping parades in Nunhead and Peckham Rye.

5. The group wants to try to alter council processes so that local residents and community groups are consulted at an earlier stage in the planning and development process - many conversations take place between council officers, developers and businesses before planning applications are submitted. The group will ask that the Community Council meeting on 8th February supports a proposal to amend the council's constitution in May so that council officers are required to consult community councils before talking to developers about local community buildings. The change would give the community council an automatic right to formally comment on possible uses for the buildings.

6. Finally, the group will investigate how it might change the council's 'Statement of Community Involvement' which in reality involves a lot of statements and little community involvement. A better policy could again ensure an increased voice for local communities.

I'll give another update soon on the prospect of Peckham Rye Projects taking over responsibility for the old toilets building.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Know Your Ryes!

A few weeks ago I was in a meeting with some local residents and council officers. During the meeting one person started referring to Rye Lane, when in fact they meant Peckham Rye East. Later on another started talking about Peckham Rye Common and it took us a little while to work out that they really meant Peckham Rye Park.   You can't really blame people for getting a little confused. There are so many references to "Rye" in our little bit of South London that even the locals can get mixed up. So I thought I'd have a go at writing a little glossary of all the Ryes hereabout.  Clearly I'm making a rod for my own back here, so please point out any errors I've made in the comments box below.  Anyway, here are my definitions of the ubiquitous Ryes. Some serious, some not so serious, and in no particular order: Peckham Rye Ward - The council ward area. Peckham Rye Ward was created out of Rye Ward, Waverley Ward and Bellenden Ward following the Local

Lib Dems claim they're not in charge in Peckham Rye

(A tweet from the Peckham Rye Lib Dems) Peckham Rye Lib Dems are now claiming that Labour 'run' Peckham Rye (take a look above). When asked by a local resident "Am I right in thinking Lib Dems run Southwark but Labour run Peckham Rye?", a Peckham Rye Lib Dem candiate replied, "Yes you're right. For the next three months Lab run Peckham Rye. Then we take over..." Given that, just like every other area in Southwark, Peckham Rye is run by the Lib Dem-Tory Executive it seems this is just the latest in a string of attempts to mislead people into thinking they've got nothing to do with Southwark's failures. Of course, Peckham Rye does have three Labour councillors, who do a great job of representing our area and our concerns at the Town Hall. However this is very different from 'running' Peckham Rye. If only we could just opt out of the Lib Dem chaos! In truth, the policy levers and almost all the money spent by the council are under the cont

Another Bog Standard Update

Many local residents may well be wondering what is happening with the previously proposed development of the toilet block near the junction of Peckham Rye and East Dulwich Road. Before Renata, Victoria and I were even elected as councillors, this had become quite a lively issue. I recently asked officers at the council what is going on, because nothing appeared to be happening with the block. Well, since the last update, this is what has happened: 1. The last proposed tenant - a not-for-profit gallery offering outreach programmes to local schools and groups - dropped out of the process without having made the required planning application. 2. The property is now under offer to a new proposed tenant. They run a children's nursery and wish to expand. 3. They have already made a planning application for a change of use. 4. We are currently waiting for a formal decision from development control so that the lease can proceed. I'll update again here as soon as I have further news. Sp